Equipment and source materials
Identify the owner of drawings, accessible backups and third-party device documentation. List items to be supplied and mark any missing project files before estimating investigation work.
WORKING TOGETHER
Start with the requirement, agree the responsibilities, and verify the work against a defined scope.
Tell us what the equipment does, what is available now and what needs to change.
Confirm the platform, deliverables, exclusions, responsibilities and acceptance checks.
Build the scoped logic, screens and documentation, then review them against the agreed requirements.
Carry out the agreed checks, resolve observations and hand over the specified project files and records.
A plain-text checklist for hardware, required functions, project files and acceptance responsibilities. No upload or automatic submission.
MAKE THE INTERFACES EXPLICIT
The scope should cover the people and dependencies around the code. This avoids discovering missing hardware, licences or test access at the end.
Identify the owner of drawings, accessible backups and third-party device documentation. List items to be supplied and mark any missing project files before estimating investigation work.
Record decisions against a project version. Explain whether a request corrects the agreed function or changes the scope; confirm its effect on files, tests, timing and price before proceeding.
Agree the authorised onsite person, hardware availability and the conditions under which actions can be checked. Offline screen or logic tests do not replace field wiring and equipment verification.
List editable projects, software versions, comments, tags, drawings and operation notes. Treat runtime licences, third-party restrictions and maintenance responsibilities as distinct deliverables.
REMOTE COLLABORATION
Some development and review tasks can be carried out remotely. Safe physical operation still depends on the actual machine, access conditions and an authorised onsite person.
We agree who provides the equipment, who can operate it, which checks are required and when an issue must be handled on site. Remote connectivity is not a substitute for those responsibilities.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Development and review can be organised remotely where the available files and test arrangements make that practical. Physical commissioning requires an authorised onsite person, agreed access and application-specific safety checks.
Editable engineering projects, comments, tag lists and other documents should be specified in the quotation. Proprietary components, existing third-party programs and licence restrictions must be considered separately.
Do not assume they are. Engineering services, the generated project and commercial runtime licences are different items; the quotation should list what is and is not included.
START WITH THE REQUIREMENT
A process description and an equipment list are a useful starting point.